🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.