🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on deploying state troops in the Oregon city, after a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an larger panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the latest turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send state military units in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that local officers have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under consideration simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”